|
Facts In Action
|
Page
One:
Family
Child Care Providers and Kith and Kin Caregivers Face Unique Barriers
to Training
 Recent
research on the quality of child care settings has suggested that
provider training and education is one of the factors associated with
high-quality child care and better outcomes for children. (For example,
see "Three Studies Find Quality Child Care Helps Kids,"
Facts in Action, March 2000.) While these studies provide evidence
that program quality - including teacher training and education -
have an influence on the development of children, they focus exclusively
on center-based care. In fact, there is very little research on non-center-based
child care settings, despite the fact that nationally 45.7% of children
under age five are in in-home, relative, or family child care settings
(Children's Defense Fund, Key Facts 1999 Edition).
| Kith
and Kin Care: care provided
by non-relatives (kith) or by relatives (kin) in either their
own homes or the child's home. |
Of
the few studies that do focus on family child care, several have
found that training and education is related to the quality of care.
Little is known, however, about the relationship between training
and education and developmental outcomes for children in family
child care settings. Despite this overall lack of evidence, based
on the research done in center-based settings we can assume that
training and education would have a similar impact on the quality
of care and on the developmental outcomes of children in non-center
based settings.
Although
family child care and kith and kin care are very different, they
share some common barriers to accessing meaningful training opportunities.
Two recent studies showed that traditional models of recruitment
and training do not work for these providers, and listed the barriers
to training these providers face. .And This Helps Me How?:
Family Child Care Providers Discuss Training and Child
Care by Kith and Kin - Supporting Family, Friends, and Neighbors
Caring for Children both report on some of the difficulties
non-center-based providers face in seeking training, detail the
limitations of traditional center-based models of recruitment and
training, and provide strategies for making training more accessible
and relevant to non-center-based providers.
The
study described in .And This Helps Me How?: Family Child Care
Providers Discuss Training is based on a series of interviews
and focus groups with family child care providers, parents, and
representatives from early care and education training programs
and child care associations. Through these interviews and focus
groups, the researchers gathered information on the benefits and
challenges to providers in participating in training, as well as
general information about the content and format of training activities.
Researchers
identified four issues that were cited as common barriers or limitations
to current approaches to training: availability, accessibility,
lack of recognition, and relevance of content. Many providers said
that training specific to family child care was not available to
them. In addition, when trainings were offered, providers found
it difficult to afford the cost, find the time, or find transportation
to attend these trainings. Providers also said that training programs
often failed to recognize prior training and, more specifically,
informal training programs. Finally, providers said that the trainings
offered were geared towards center-based care, and had little relevance
to their work in family child care.
The
researchers of the family child care study provide the following
suggestions for improving training models for family child care
providers:
- Training
needs to be more accessible - distance, scheduling problems, and
resources (both in terms of time and money) should be considered
in planning training programs;
- Training
needs to be more relevant to the work of family child care providers,
and whenever possible, should link theory to practice;
- Training
should take advantage of new technologies - providers cited the
internet as a valuable resource in enabling distance-learning
options;
- Training
programs need to respect and recognize prior education and informal
training.
The
second study, Child Care by Kith and Kin - Supporting Family,
Friends,and Neighbors Caring for Children, provides a summary
of research and traditional policy approaches regarding kith and
kin care, as well as a survey of innovative program strategies for
outreach and training with kith and kin caregivers. The authors
of this report found that there is very little specific research
on kith and kin caregivers. The research that does exist finds that
traditional models of kith and kin training, which often focus on
encouraging caregivers to start family child care businesses, are
not relevant or appropriate for many kith and kin caregivers. In
addition, the study found that few, if any, policy efforts focus
on kith and kin caregivers who are not receiving public subsidies.
The
researchers of the kith and kin study also suggest several strategies
for developing a more appropriate model for outreach and training
for kith and kin caregivers, including:
- Using
family support models, like home visits and support groups, to
engage kith and kin;
- Using
a community center as a hub for activities and networking site
for kith and kin caregivers;
- Taking
advantage of new technologies and new partners (such as cable-access
television) for outreach and training;
- Bringing
resources directly to kith and kin caregivers, such as mobile
lending libraries; and,
- Reaching
out to kith and kin caregivers as part of a statewide or community
effort to improve the quality of all child care.
While
there is currently little research evidence that training and education
is related to the quality of care and developmental outcomes for
children in non-center-based settings, it seems obvious that specific
training in early care and education would be valuable to both family
child care providers and kith and kin caregivers. These providers
should be encouraged to seek training opportunities. However, it
is essential that the trainings, programs, and policies that are
available to them are sensitive to their experiences as non-center-based
providers.
|
Key
Findings |
|
Key
Finding 1: There
is very little specific research on training opportunities
and strategies for non-center-based providers.
Key
Finding 2:
Traditional
recruitment and training strategies do not work for non-center-based
providers.
Key
Finding 3:
Family
child care providers often find that the trainings offered
to them have little relevance to their day-to-day work. |
| Action
Steps |
Encourage policy makers to support training and education programs
that meet the needs of a variety of early education and care
providers.

If you or your agency provide training, make it provider-friendly.
That is, hold trainings in the evenings, provide assistance
with tuition, fees, and transportation, make trainings available
via the internet, and ask local providers what topics they
would find useful.
If you are a provider, let your local training and education
agencies know the types of trainings opportunities that would
interest you.
|
Source:
".And
This Helps Me How?: Family Child Care Providers Discuss Training,"
Andrew R. Taylor, Lee Dunster, and June Pollard, Early Childhood
Research Quarterly, Volume 14, Number 3, 1999.
For
more information:
look on-line at www.udel.edu/ecrq or email ecrq@udel.edu.Editor's Note: this url is no longer active.
Source:
"Child Care by Kith and Kin - Supporting Family, Friends, and
Neighbors Caring for Children," Ann Collins and Barbara Carlson,
Children and Welfare Reform: Issue Brief 5, National Center
for Children in Poverty (NCCP), Joseph L. Mailman School of Public
Health of Columbia University, September 1998.
For
more information:
contact NCCP at (212) 304-7100 or by email at nccp@columbia.edu.
Facts in Action, August 2000
|
| Goodbye from the printed version of Facts in Action. |

|